Forde got out of Biblicism; you can, too – 19
The “post-liberal Lutheran” is, of course, something of a shadowy, if not menacing, figure on the contemporary scene, perhaps not yet clearly defined, often a puzzle to both friend and foe, usually mistaken simply for a hard-line conservative confessionalist or orthodoxist. But that is seriously to misread the situation. It is a post-Enlightenment, post-liberal position. A post-liberal Lutheran is one who has been through the options spawned since the Reformation and realizes that they have all been used up. Least of all does infallibilism or reactionary conservatism of any sort provide an answer. In any case, Lutherans have always been uneasy with infallibilist solutions to faith’s questions. Even where they have flirted with the ideas of scriptural infallibility they have had some anxiety and suspicion that it might be contrary to a gospel appropriation of the scriptural message.
(Read the whole collection here.)
Gerhard Forde, “The Catholic Impasse: Reflections On Lutheran-Catholic Dialogue Today,” Promoting Unity. Themes in Lutheran-Catholic Dialogue. Eds. H. George Anderson and James R. Crumley Jr. (Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1989) 67-77; here 72, emphasis added.
Obama’s mosque visit and gender apartheid – Asra Nomani
Muslim woman offers tough love advice for Christians in interfaith worship. Read more here.
The God Profusion – Naomi Riley
Europe’s churches are empty – but don’t take that as a sign of reason’s triumph. More than half of Icelanders believe in elves and trolls. Read more here.
Liturgical Change Is Afoot in the Catholic Church — Mark Brumley
New rules on foot washing will not change the masculine identity of priestly ministry. Read more here.
Tim Wengert inserted a word in Article 14 that should not be there. The added word puts a spin on Article 14 that should not be there.
See the wrongly inserted word “[public]” and its inaccurate footnote below:
“Concerning church government it is taught that no one should publicly teach, preach, or administer the sacraments without a proper [public] call.”
Read more here.
Forde: “We don’t really even have a basis for making an absolute separation between evil and good.” Read it here. And Forde on the Devil here.
Political Action and the Primacy of the Good — Daniel Mahoney
“Manent thus proposes a “social contract” with French Muslims that accepts them as they are, along with their moral practices, with two notable and crucial exceptions. He argues that the burqa is inadmissible because “it prevents the exchange of signs by which a human being recognizes another human being.” Europeans have never covered their faces. This “lugubrious servitude” is incompatible with a free society. France has the “right and duty to impose the most absolute prohibition on this manner of dress.” The second prohibition is that of polygamy. The family, with one husband and one wife, is the building block of civil society and an indispensable pillar of a free society.
“Manent recognizes that the increase in open acceptance of Muslim ways (e.g., dietary restrictions in schools, separation of boys and girls in certain social activities) comes with certain risks. Those risks can be compensated for by active efforts to preserve or reinforce the “ancient constitution” of France. To begin with, Muslims must accept that they live in a nation of a Christian mark with a strong and enduring Jewish presence. They must break with the umma, a universal Islamic empire, and proclaim their loyalty to France. They must wean themselves of reliance on foreign funding and repudiate extremism of every kind. Most of all, they must stop hiding behind accusations of Islamophobia. In practice, the reflexive evocation of Islamophobia has led to serious restrictions on the ability of Europeans to think, write, and speak as they please. It undermines even the minimal capacity for self-criticism in the Arab-Islamic world and among Muslims in Western countries. French Muslims accordingly see themselves as victims and involve themselves in the civic forum only to express grievances.” Read more here.
The Oscars Blackout Protest Why it’s morally, strategically, and aesthetically wrong – Danusha Goska
The Oscars Blackout protest is wrong. It is factually wrong. It is morally wrong. It is spiritually wrong. It is aesthetically wrong.
The Kids Are Not Alright: A Lesbian’s Daughter Speaks Out — Brandi Walton
Some children of gay parents, just like some gay people, do not support gay parenting or gay marriage. Male and female biology each provide something every child needs—together.
How Much Time Do You Have To Find Out About Islam? — Hugh Fitzgerald
Why learning the truth about Islam is such a tremendous challenge for Unbelievers.
Midwest Lutherans Largely Reject Violence – Charles Johnson
A new survey of Midwest Lutherans, reported by the Iowahawk News Service, contains nothing that should alarm anyone: Midwest Lutherans Largely Reject Violence.
US Presiding Bishop Uses His Color to Lambast Primates in Canterbury – David Virtue
It was a brilliant move by the black US Presiding Bishop to use his color in Canterbury following the vote to discipline the American Episcopal Church by 38 Primates of the Anglican Communion.
Muslim Phoenix Doctor Seeks to Save America and Islam from ISIS-Inspired Extremists | Phoenix New Times
Jasser promises more Luther-like acts.
“There’s been an outpouring of drivel over Merkel’s supposed big-heartedness
and her supposed Christian decency (and did you know that she is a
pastor’s daughter?), but the reality is that flinging open the doors was a
profoundly narcissistic act. It wasn’t about her people or her country: it
was about her.” Read more here.
Remember Sayyid Sayeed who received three standing ovations from the 2011
ELCA Churchwide Assembly? Here he is again.
Your church is hosting a forum: “Meet Your Muslim Neighbor.” The speaker is from the local Islamic Community Center. He is an articulate, friendly Muslim. You’re interested!